Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 12 | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2022-06-29 | 2016-09-01 |
| 6.65 x 3.15 x 0.39 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 8.29 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| -- | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | -- |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy XCover 6 Pro is a little bit better than Moto Z Force, having a score of 77.6 against 75.8. The Galaxy XCover 6 Pro is a a lot newer phone than Moto Z Force, but it is heavier and incredibly thicker. These devices have Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy XCover 6 Pro has older 12 version and Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat version.
Moto Z Force features an extremely better CPU than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, although it has 4 lesser cpu cores and 2 GB less RAM. Moto Z Force has a better looking screen than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 resolution and a greater pixels density.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro features a bit more storage for games and applications than Moto Z Force, because although it has a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 1 TB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage. Galaxy XCover 6 Pro has improved battery duration than Motorola Moto Z Force, because it has 4050mAh of battery capacity.
The Moto Z Force shoots slightly better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, although it has a much less mega-pixels resolution camera, they both have the same aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.