Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-06-29 | 2019-09-05 |
| 6.65 x 3.15 x 0.39 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches |
| 8.29 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| -- | Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 450.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 12.42 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Zoom has an overall score of 80, which is just a bit better than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro's overall score of 77.6. Despite of the fact that the Motorola One Zoom is much older than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, it's design is thinner and lighter. Motorola One Zoom has a bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has a quite lower 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a bit greater pixels number per inch in the display.
The Motorola One Zoom has a much greater hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, although it has 2 GB lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. Motorola One Zoom counts with a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has a less mega pixels back facing camera, it also counts with a lot bigger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a larger diafragm aperture to capture better low-light images and videos.
Galaxy XCover 6 Pro has a much greater memory capacity to store more apps and games than Motorola One Zoom, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Galaxy XCover 6 Pro also has an external SD slot that holds up to 1 TB. The Galaxy XCover 6 Pro counts with a bit superior battery duration than Motorola One Zoom, because it has a 1 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.