Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 12 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2022-06-29 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.65 x 3.15 x 0.39 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 8.29 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| -- | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola razr (2020) has a global score of 87, which is much better than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro's 77.6 score. Both phones we compare here include Android operating system, but the Motorola razr (2020) has the previous 11 version while Galaxy XCover 6 Pro has Android 12. Even though Motorola razr (2020) is older than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, it's body is lighter and way thinner.
The Motorola razr (2020) has a little more vivid screen than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, although it has a little smaller display, a just a bit less pixels per screen inch and a quite lower 876 x 2142 resolution. The Motorola razr (2020) features an extremely better CPU than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola razr (2020) also has 2 GB more RAM.
Motorola razr (2020) features a greater camera than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has a worse resolution back facing camera, it also counts with a lot bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a larger diafragm aperture for better low-light images. The Galaxy XCover 6 Pro has a bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has just 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 1 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro features a very superior battery duration than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 4050mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.