Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-06-29 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.65 x 3.15 x 0.39 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 8.29 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A50 is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, having a general score of 83.8 against 77.6. Although the Samsung Galaxy A50 is a lot older than the Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, it's construction is notably thinner and a lot lighter. The Samsung Galaxy A50 has a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has a quite lower 1080 x 2340 resolution and a quite smaller display, it also counts with a little greater pixel density.
The Galaxy XCover 6 Pro features a bit more memory to store more apps and games than Galaxy A50, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Galaxy XCover 6 Pro also has a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB. The Samsung Galaxy A50 has an extremely better processor than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores.
Galaxy A50 has a bit better camera than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has a way less mega-pixels camera in the back, it also counts with a lot bigger sensor shooting way higher quality pictures and videos and a larger diafragm aperture to capture better photos and videos in poorly lited situations.
The Galaxy XCover 6 Pro counts with just a bit better battery life than Samsung Galaxy A50, because it has 4050mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.