Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2022-06-29 | 2019-10-20 |
| 6.65 x 3.15 x 0.39 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 8.29 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| -- | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50s has a general score of 86.6, which is much better than the Galaxy XCover 6 Pro's 77.6 general score. The Galaxy A50s is an way older cellphone than the Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, but Samsung could make it way thinner and a lot lighter anyway. Both of these phones have Android OS, but Galaxy A50s has 10 version and Galaxy XCover 6 Pro has Android 12.
Galaxy A50s features a really superior performance than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro. They have the same RAM memory amount and a Octa-Core processing unit. The Samsung Galaxy A50s has a bit sharper display than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has a quite lower 1080 x 2340px resolution and a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a little more pixels per inch of display.
The Galaxy XCover 6 Pro counts with a little bit more storage to store more apps and games than Galaxy A50s, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the Galaxy XCover 6 Pro also has an external memory card slot that allows up to 1 TB. Samsung Galaxy A50s features a very superior camera than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has a back-facing camera with lesser mega pixels resolution and a tinier camera aperture which is not so good for shooting photographs or video in poorly lited environments, it also counts with a lot bigger back camera sensor capturing lot higher quality videos and photographs.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro counts with just a little better battery life than Galaxy A50s, because it has a 4050mAh battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.