Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2022-06-29 | 2019-12-27 |
| 6.65 x 3.15 x 0.39 inches | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| 8.29 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| -- | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A51 is better than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, with an 85.5 score against 77.6. Both of these devices use Android OS, but the Galaxy A51 has 11 version and Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro has Android 12 version. Even though Galaxy A51 is noticeably older than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, it's body is way lighter and thinner.
The Galaxy A51 features a very superior processor than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. Samsung Galaxy A51 has a little sharper screen than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller display, and they both have exactly the same 1080 x 2400 resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A51 also counts with a bit better pixels count per screen inch.
The Galaxy A51 features a way better camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has a less MP camera and a tinier aperture which is not recommended for low-light captures, it also counts with a way bigger camera sensor which offers a way better photo and video quality. The Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro has a bit more memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy A51, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro also has a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 1 TB.
The Galaxy XCover 6 Pro has just a bit longer battery performance than Galaxy A51, because it has a 1% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.