Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2022-06-29 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.65 x 3.15 x 0.39 inches | 6.44 x 2.99 x 0.30 inches |
| 8.29 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| -- | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 411.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 399 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A71 has a general score of 87.5, which is better than the Galaxy XCover 6 Pro's general score of 77.6. Both of these phones include Android OS, but the Galaxy A71 has the previous 11 version while Galaxy XCover 6 Pro has Android 12 version. Galaxy A71 is an incredibly older phone than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, but it's way thinner and a lot lighter anyway.
The Galaxy A71 has a very superior hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro. They have a Octa-Core CPU and a 6 GB RAM. Galaxy A71 features a slightly better looking display than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has a little bit worse pixels amount in each inch in the screen, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, the Galaxy A71 also counts with a bit bigger display.
Galaxy A71 captures a lot better videos and photos than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, and although they both have a same size aperture, the Galaxy A71 also has a lot bigger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a back-facing camera with a way better 64 megapixels resolution. Galaxy XCover 6 Pro features just a bit more memory capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A71, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Galaxy XCover 6 Pro also has an external memory card slot that holds up to 1 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 features just a little better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because it has an 11% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.