Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-06-29 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.65 x 3.15 x 0.39 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 8.29 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| -- | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 399 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 is much better than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, with a 90.8 score against 77.6. Although the Galaxy Note 20 is older than the Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, it's construction is thinner and somewhat lighter. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 features a little more vivid display than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has a just a little lower amount of pixels per inch in the screen, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2400, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 also counts with a little bit larger screen.
Galaxy Note 20 features a much better performing processor than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Note 20 also has more RAM memory. Galaxy Note 20 captures much better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has a camera with a way lower 12 megapixels resolution, and they both have the same diafragm aperture, the Galaxy Note 20 also counts with a much larger sensor providing a way better image quality.
Galaxy XCover 6 Pro has a way bigger storage for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage, the Galaxy XCover 6 Pro also has a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 1 TB. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 counts with a little longer battery performance than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because it has a 4300mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.