Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2022-06-29 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.65 x 3.15 x 0.39 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 8.29 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| -- | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is much better than the Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, having a 98.9 score against 77.6. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is an older phone than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, but Samsung made it lighter and thinner anyway. These devices use Android OS, but Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has newer 13 version and Galaxy XCover 6 Pro has Android 12 version, so it offers some additional features and some performance improvements.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a sharper display than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because it has a better 1440 x 3088 resolution, a quite better pixels quantity per inch of display and a little bigger display. The Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro counts with a little bit better memory for games and applications than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro also has a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a very superior processing power than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a larger amount of RAM. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with just a bit longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because it has an 11% larger battery capacity.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra shoots way better videos and photos than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a back camera with much more MP and a much bigger sensor providing a way better image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.