Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| 2022-06-29 | 2013-09-04 |
| 6.65 x 3.15 x 0.39 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 8.29 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| -- | Black, Pink and White |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 265.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.5 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time |
| 6 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 3 is a bit better than the Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, having a overall score of 81.2 against 77.6. Both phones in our current comparison include Android OS, but the Galaxy Note 3 has older 5.0 version while Galaxy XCover 6 Pro has Android 12 version. The Galaxy Note 3 is an extremely older device than the Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, but Samsung could make it thinner and way lighter.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 counts with a brighter display than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, although it has a little less pixels per display inch, a quite lower resolution of 1920 x 1080 and a bit smaller display. The Galaxy Note 3 counts with a much powerful processing unit than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has an inferior number of cores and less RAM memory, it also counts with a graphics processing unit.
The Galaxy XCover 6 Pro has a very superior memory for games and applications than Galaxy Note 3, because it has more internal memory capacity and an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB. Samsung Galaxy Note 3 captures clearer videos and photos than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture and a much worse resolution back-facing camera, it also counts with a much larger back-facing camera sensor providing a much higher image quality.
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro counts with longer battery life than Galaxy Note 3, because it has a 4050mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.