Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 5.1 |
| 2022-06-29 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.65 x 3.15 x 0.39 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 8.29 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| -- | Black, Gold, Gray and White |
| -- | Glass; metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.5 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 6.12 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time |
| 6 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 5 is just a bit better than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, with a general score of 79.3 against 77.6. Both phones we are comparing use Android OS, but Galaxy Note 5 has an older 5.1 version while Galaxy XCover 6 Pro has Android 12 version. Although the Galaxy Note 5 is much older than the Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, it's design is incredibly thinner and extremely lighter.
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 features a lot better processing power than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, although it has lesser cores and lesser RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy Note 5 features a way better screen than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per inch in the screen and a better 2560 x 1440px resolution.
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 takes a little bit better photos and videos than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for low light images and a camera with much less MP, it also counts with a much larger camera sensor. Galaxy XCover 6 Pro counts with a much bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy Note 5, because it has an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB and 64 GB more internal memory capacity.
The Galaxy XCover 6 Pro has a much longer battery lifetime than Galaxy Note 5, because it has a 4050mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.