Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-06-29 | 2015-08-21 |
| 6.65 x 3.15 x 0.39 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 8.29 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| -- | Black sapphire, Gold platinum, Silver titan and White pearl |
| -- | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note5 is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, having an 80.2 score against 77.6. The Galaxy Note5 is an notably older device than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, but Samsung made it a lot lighter and way thinner anyway. Samsung Galaxy Note5 has a much better display than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px and more pixels per inch in the screen.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro features a way bigger memory to store more games and applications than Galaxy Note5, because it has more internal storage capacity and a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB. Galaxy Note5 features a much more powerful processor than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, although it has 2 GB less RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro counts with a much longer battery duration than Galaxy Note5, because it has a 35 percent more battery capacity. Samsung Galaxy Note5 takes a bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has a lot less mega pixels resolution back facing camera and a tinier camera aperture, it also counts with a much bigger sensor providing a much better image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.