Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 88.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2022-06-29 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.65 x 3.15 x 0.39 inches | 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 8.29 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| -- | Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 281.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 551 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10 has a general score of 88.3, which is much better than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro's global score of 77.6. Both devices in this review include Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy S10 has an older 11 version and Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro has Android 12 version. Although the Galaxy S10 is older than the Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, it's design is notably lighter and notably thinner.
Galaxy S10 has a more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 3040 resolution and a higher pixel number per inch of screen. The Galaxy S10 has a much greater hardware performance than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S10 also has 2 GB more RAM.
Galaxy S10 has a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has a lot worse 12 megapixels resolution back-facing camera, it also counts with a lot bigger back camera sensor and a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better low light photos and videos. Galaxy XCover 6 Pro features slightly more storage to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S10, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Galaxy XCover 6 Pro also has an external memory slot that holds up to 1 TB.
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro counts with superior battery life than Galaxy S10, because it has a 19% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.