Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 93.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2022-06-29 | 2019-05-16 |
| 6.65 x 3.15 x 0.39 inches | 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 8.29 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| -- | Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 342.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 502 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 5G is way better than the Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, with a global score of 93.6 against 77.6. Both of these phones have Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy S10 5G has an older 11 version while Galaxy XCover 6 Pro has Android 12 version. The Galaxy S10 5G is an notably older cellphone than the Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, but it is a lot thinner and lighter anyway.
The Galaxy S10 5G has a better display than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because it has a higher screen pixel density, a bit bigger display and a better 1440 x 3040 resolution. The Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro features more storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 1 TB.
Galaxy S10 5G features an extremely better processing unit than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy S10 5G also has 2 GB more RAM memory. The Galaxy S10 5G features a bit longer battery duration than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
The Galaxy S10 5G shoots slightly better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has a much worse 12 mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera, it also counts with a bigger aperture and a lot larger back camera sensor shooting way better quality videos and photographs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.