Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-06-29 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.65 x 3.15 x 0.39 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 8.29 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| -- | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10e has a general score of 86.3, which is better than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro's global score of 77.6. The Galaxy S10e is an way older phone than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, but Samsung managed to make it extremely lighter and incredibly thinner anyway. The Galaxy S10e has a better display than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller display and a quite lower 1080 x 2280 pixels resolution, it also counts with a just a little better display pixel density.
Galaxy XCover 6 Pro counts with a little bit better memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S10e, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage, the Galaxy XCover 6 Pro also has a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 1 TB. Galaxy S10e features a much more powerful processing unit than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro. They have a 6 GB RAM and a Octa-Core processing unit.
The Galaxy S10e shoots slightly better videos and photos than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has a way lower resolution camera, it also counts with a lot larger camera sensor and a bigger diafragm aperture. Galaxy XCover 6 Pro has superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because it has a 31% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.