Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 94.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2022-06-29 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.65 x 3.15 x 0.39 inches | 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| 8.29 ounces | 5.78 ounces |
| -- | Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 566 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 is much better than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, getting a 94.8 score against 77.6. Although Samsung Galaxy S20 is extremely older than the Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, it's body is noticeably thinner and noticeably lighter. Both phones we compare here use Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy S20 has a newer 13 version while Galaxy XCover 6 Pro has Android 12.
Galaxy S20 has a very superior performance than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy S20 also has 6 GB more RAM. Galaxy S20 has a much better looking display than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a greater pixels count in each inch in the screen and a higher 1440 x 3200 resolution.
Galaxy XCover 6 Pro features a bit more storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S20, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the Galaxy XCover 6 Pro also has a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 1 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro counts with just a little bit longer battery performance than Galaxy S20, because it has 4050mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh. Galaxy S20 features a better camera than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has a lot lower 12 MP resolution back camera, and they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Galaxy S20 also counts with a way larger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.