Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2022-06-29 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.65 x 3.15 x 0.39 inches | 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 8.29 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| -- | Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 509.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 10.56 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 FE has a global score of 90.8, which is better than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro's 77.6 general score. Galaxy S20 FE's design is somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner than the Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, although it was released around 21 months before. These phones have Android operating system, but the Galaxy S20 FE has older 11 version while Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro has Android 12.
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE counts with a little sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller display, and they both have an equal resolution of 1080 x 2400px, the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE also counts with a little bit more pixels per inch in the display. Galaxy S20 FE features a lot better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro. Both of them have a 6 GB RAM and the same number of cores.
Galaxy XCover 6 Pro has slightly more storage to store more apps and games than Galaxy S20 FE, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Galaxy XCover 6 Pro also has an external SD slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB. The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has a bit longer battery lifetime than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 4050mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE shoots much better pictures and videos than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has a back camera with much less megapixels resolution, and they both have a same size aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE also counts with a way bigger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.