Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2022-06-29 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.65 x 3.15 x 0.39 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 8.29 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| -- | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a global score of 98, which is way better than the Galaxy XCover 6 Pro's global score of 77.6. Both of these devices work with Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has the newer 13 version while Galaxy XCover 6 Pro has Android 12. Despite of the fact that the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is older than the Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, it's construction is thinner and just a bit lighter.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a very superior processing unit than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has 6 GB more RAM. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because it has a greater pixels quantity in each screen inch, a bit larger screen and a better resolution of 1440 x 3200px.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a very superior camera than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a back facing camera with a much better 108 mega-pixels resolution and a much larger sensor taking much better quality videos and photographs.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro features a bit more storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro also has a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 1 TB. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with greater battery lifetime than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 4050mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.