Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 98.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 11 |
| 2022-06-29 | 2021-01-29 |
| 6.65 x 3.15 x 0.39 inches | 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches |
| 8.29 ounces | 8.04 ounces |
| -- | Phantom black and Silver |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 966.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 516 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S21 Ultra is a lot better than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, having a 98.1 score against 77.6. Both of these phones have Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy S21 Ultra has the older 11 version and Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro has Android 12. Galaxy S21 Ultra's design is thinner and just a little bit lighter than the Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, although it was released about 17 months before.
The Galaxy S21 Ultra has a much more vibrant display than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because it has a higher pixel quantity in each screen inch, a quite bigger display and a better resolution of 1440 x 3200 pixels. Galaxy XCover 6 Pro has a much bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy S21 Ultra, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Galaxy XCover 6 Pro also has a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 1 TB.
Galaxy S21 Ultra features a much powerful processing unit than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy S21 Ultra also has more RAM. The Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra has better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
The Galaxy S21 Ultra shoots a lot better photos and videos than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, and although they both have a same size camera aperture, the Galaxy S21 Ultra also has a way better 108 megapixels resolution back facing camera and a lot larger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.