Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 93.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2022-06-29 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.65 x 3.15 x 0.39 inches | 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches |
| 8.29 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| -- | Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 799.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 422 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Multi-touch |
| 7.5 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| processor | Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S22 is way better than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, getting a general score of 93.4 against 77.6. Even though the Samsung Galaxy S22 and the Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro were only released 4 months apart, the Samsung Galaxy S22 is a lot lighter and a lot thinner. Both of these phones have Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy S22 has 13 version while Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro has Android 12, so it provides the user a couple additional features and performance improvements.
The Galaxy S22 has an extremely better CPU than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy S22 also has 2 GB more RAM. Samsung Galaxy S22 features a way better screen than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has a quite lower 1080 x 2340px resolution and a little smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit higher pixels density.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro has a much bigger memory to store more apps and games than Galaxy S22, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro also has a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB. Galaxy XCover 6 Pro counts with a little longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S22, because it has 4050mAh of battery capacity instead of 3700mAh.
Samsung Galaxy S22 takes greater photographs and videos than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, and although they both have a same size camera aperture and a back-facing camera with a 50 megapixels resolution, the Samsung Galaxy S22 also has a way bigger sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.