Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2022-06-29 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.65 x 3.15 x 0.39 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 8.29 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| -- | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a global score of 95.4, which is way better than the Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro's 77.6 global score. Both of these phones include Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has the newer 13 version and Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro has Android 12 version, so it offers some additional features and performance improvements. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is a a little bit lighter and thinner cellphone than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, even when they were released with only a couple months difference.
Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a much sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because it has more pixels per inch in the display, a better 1440 x 3088 resolution and a little bit larger display. Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro has a much bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy S22 Ultra, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro also has a SD extension slot that supports up to 1 TB.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra features a lot better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a greater amount of RAM. The Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a very superior camera than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a much bigger back camera sensor taking way better quality videos and photographs and a much better 108 megapixels resolution back camera.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has longer battery performance than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.