Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-06-29 | 2016-03-11 |
| 6.65 x 3.15 x 0.39 inches | 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 8.29 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| -- | Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 124.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 855 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S7 is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, with a score of 79.5 against 77.6. Although Samsung Galaxy S7 is older than the Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, it's body is a lot lighter and much thinner. Galaxy S7 features a much powerful CPU than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, although it has less cpu cores (although they are faster) and lesser RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy S7 features a much sharper display than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has a really smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a greater pixel number per inch of display. Samsung Galaxy S7 captures a little bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has a back-facing camera with way less megapixels, it also counts with a larger aperture and a way bigger sensor capturing lot better quality videos and photographs.
The Galaxy XCover 6 Pro has a much better storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy S7, because it has an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB and 128 GB internal storage capacity. Galaxy XCover 6 Pro features a really longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S7, because it has a 35% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.