Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2022-06-29 | 2016-03-11 |
| 6.65 x 3.15 x 0.39 inches | 5.94 x 2.86 x 0.30 inches |
| 8.29 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| -- | Black, Black pearl, Coral blue, Gold, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 336.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S7 edge has an overall score of 78.1, which is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro's score of 77.6. The Galaxy S7 edge construction is noticeably thinner and lighter than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, although it was released 6 years before. Both devices in this comparison include Android OS, but the Galaxy S7 edge has newer 8.0 Oreo version while Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro has Android 12, providing you some nice extra features and performance improvements.
Samsung Galaxy S7 edge features a way better performance than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, although it has 4 less cores (although they are faster) and a lower amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy S7 edge counts with a much better looking display than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher number of pixels per display inch and a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution.
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro counts with much more memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy S7 edge, because it has more internal storage and a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB. Galaxy S7 edge features a slightly better camera than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has a lot lower resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a bigger aperture for better low light captures and video and a much bigger sensor shooting much higher quality pictures and videos.
Galaxy XCover 6 Pro counts with just a bit better battery life than Galaxy S7 edge, because it has a 13% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.