Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 81.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-06-29 | 2017-04-21 |
| 6.65 x 3.15 x 0.39 inches | 5.86 x 2.68 x 0.31 inches |
| 8.29 ounces | 5.47 ounces |
| -- | Arctic silver, Burgundy red, Coral blue, Maple gold, Midnight black, Orchid gray and Rose pink |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 173.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S8 has a score of 81.7, which is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro's overall score of 77.6. The Samsung Galaxy S8 is an extremely older device than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, but it is way lighter and way thinner anyway. The Galaxy S8 has an extremely better processing unit than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
Galaxy S8 has a better looking screen than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a greater screen density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2960. The Galaxy XCover 6 Pro features a much greater storage for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S8, because it has 128 GB internal memory and a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 1 TB.
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro features a much better battery lifetime than Galaxy S8, because it has a 4050mAh battery capacity. Samsung Galaxy S8 takes a bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has a back-facing camera with a lot worse 12 megapixels resolution, it also counts with a larger aperture for better low-light photos and video and a way bigger sensor shooting way higher quality pictures and videos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.