Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-06-29 | 2018-03-16 |
| 6.65 x 3.15 x 0.39 inches | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| 8.29 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| -- | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S9 is slightly better than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, having an 83.3 score against 77.6. The Samsung Galaxy S9 construction is a lot lighter and thinner than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, despite of the fact that it was released 4 years before. The Galaxy S9 features a much greater processing power than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Galaxy S9 counts with a better display than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher count of pixels per inch in the screen and a higher 1440 x 2960 resolution. The Galaxy S9 features a slightly better camera than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has a camera with a much worse 12 MP resolution, it also counts with a way bigger back camera sensor which provides a much better photo and video quality and a larger aperture to capture better low light photos and video.
Galaxy XCover 6 Pro features much more memory for applications and games than Galaxy S9, because it has more internal memory and an external SD slot that allows up to 1 TB. Galaxy XCover 6 Pro features a really longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S9, because it has a 4050mAh battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.