Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2022-06-29 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.65 x 3.15 x 0.39 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 8.29 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| -- | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is way better than the Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, having a overall score of 94.6 against 77.6. These phones have Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has the older 11 version and Galaxy XCover 6 Pro has Android 12 version. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2's body is noticeably thinner than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, but it is heavier and was released just 22 months before.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a little more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has a just a little worse pixel count in each display inch, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1768 x 2208px and a bigger screen. Galaxy XCover 6 Pro has a greater memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 1 TB.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a much more powerful CPU than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a higher amount of RAM. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a bit better battery performance than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity instead of 4050mAh.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a better camera than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has a camera with way less mega pixels resolution, and they both have a same size aperture, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also counts with a lot larger back-facing camera sensor taking way higher quality photographs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.