Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| Android 12 | Android 5.1 |
| 2022-06-29 | 2015-06-16 |
| 6.65 x 3.15 x 0.39 inches | 5.69 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 8.29 ounces | 5.64 ounces |
| -- | Black and White |
| -- | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 399 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.5 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 7.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xperia Z4v has an overall score of 78.8, which is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro's score of 77.6. Xperia Z4v's construction is incredibly lighter and thinner than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, even though it was released 7 years before. Both of these phones include Android OS (Operating System), but Xperia Z4v has the older 5.1 version and Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro has Android 12.
Xperia Z4v has a much more vibrant screen than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has a really smaller screen, it also counts with a better quantity of pixels per inch of screen and a higher 2560 x 1440 resolution. Galaxy XCover 6 Pro has a lot bigger storage for apps and games than Xperia Z4v, because it has a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB and more internal storage.
Sony Xperia Z4v has a much better performing processing unit than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM, and they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Sony Xperia Z4v also counts with an additional graphics processor. Galaxy XCover 6 Pro has a much better battery life than Xperia Z4v, because it has 4050mAh of battery capacity.
Sony Xperia Z4v captures better photographs and videos than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has a back camera with much less mega-pixels and a smaller camera aperture, it also counts with a way larger camera sensor taking way better quality videos and pictures.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.