Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 12 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2022-06-29 | 2019-08-20 |
| 6.65 x 3.15 x 0.39 inches | 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 8.29 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| -- | Carbon black, Glacier blue and Red flame |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 430 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro is just a bit better than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, having an 82.7 score against 77.6. Although the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro is way older than the Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, it's construction is somewhat lighter and thinner. These devices use Android OS (Operating System), but Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has an older 10 version and Galaxy XCover 6 Pro has Android 12.
The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro counts with an extremely better processor than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro. Both of them have the same number of cores and the same RAM amount. The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has a much better display than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has a quite lower 1080 x 2340 resolution and a little smaller screen, it also counts with a little better pixels quantity per inch of display.
The Galaxy XCover 6 Pro has a lot bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Galaxy XCover 6 Pro also has a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB. Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro captures a lot better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has a lower resolution back facing camera, and they both have the same aperture, the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro also counts with a lot larger sensor capturing lot higher quality photos and videos.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro has just a bit better battery life than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, because it has a 1% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.