Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 87.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 12 | Android 10 |
| 2022-06-29 | 2020-05-12 |
| 6.65 x 3.15 x 0.39 inches | 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 8.29 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| -- | Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 12.98 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has an overall score of 87.9, which is better than the Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro's 77.6 global score. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro construction is just a bit lighter and somewhat thinner than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, despite of the fact that it was released 2 years before. Both of these phones include Android OS (Operating System), but Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has older 10 version while Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro has Android 12 version.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with a better looking display than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has a bit lower screen density, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2400px, the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro also counts with a little larger display. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a much better performance than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro. Both of them have 6 GB of RAM and 8 cpu cores.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not good for taking photos and video in low light environments, it also counts with a way larger back-facing camera sensor shooting much better quality videos and photographs and a back-facing camera with a lot higher 64 megapixels resolution.
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro has a way bigger storage for applications and games than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro also has a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 1 TB. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has just a bit longer battery lifetime than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because it has a 4700mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.