Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 76.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 12 | Android 10 |
| 2022-06-29 | 2020-05-20 |
| 6.65 x 3.15 x 0.39 inches | 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches |
| 8.29 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| -- | Forest green, Midnight gray and Polar white |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 283.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 399 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset | MediaTek Helio G85 chipset |
| processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and ArmCortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover 6 Pro is a little bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, getting a global score of 77.6 against 76.6. The Galaxy XCover 6 Pro body is way newer than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9's, but it is heavier and somewhat thicker. Both phones we are comparing here come with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy XCover 6 Pro has the newer 12 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has Android 10 version.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 features an extremely better processor than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, although it has 3 GB less RAM, they both have 8 CPU cores. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 counts with a slightly better looking screen than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, although it has a quite worse display pixel density, a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a little bit smaller display.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro has a lot bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and a SD extension slot that allows up to 1 TB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 features a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has a camera in the back with a worse 48 MP resolution, and they both have a same size camera aperture, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 also counts with a lot bigger back camera sensor taking way better quality photographs.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 features greater battery performance than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because it has a 24 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.