Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 12 | Android 10 |
| 2022-06-29 | 2020-05-05 |
| 6.65 x 3.15 x 0.39 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 8.29 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| -- | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 399 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a global score of 81.1, which is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro's 77.6 overall score. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is an way older cellphone than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, but it's thinner and lighter anyway. Both of these phones use Android OS (Operating System), but Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has 10 version and Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro has Android 12.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a much powerful processing unit than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro. They have the same RAM memory amount and the same number of cores. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a bit sharper screen than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has a little bit lower pixel density, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also counts with a quite bigger screen.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro captures much clearer videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for low-light photos, it also counts with a camera with a much better 64 megapixels resolution and a lot bigger back camera sensor taking much higher quality photographs and videos.
Galaxy XCover 6 Pro counts with a way bigger memory for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because it has an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB and 64 GB more internal storage. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with longer battery duration than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because it has a 5020mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.