Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x |
| 2020-04-04 | 2019-09-20 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Black | Black, Green, Purple, Red, White and Yellow |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | $ 699.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| -- | IPS LCD |
| 576 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Apple-designed 4 core GPU |
| 9.45 | 10.35 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3110mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 11 is a bit better than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, having an 83.3 score against 80.1. The iPhone 11 comes with iOS 15.x operating system, and Galaxy XCover FieldPro comes with Android 8.0 Oreo operating system. The iPhone 11 construction is incredibly thinner and a lot lighter than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, although both of them were released with only a few months difference.
Apple iPhone 11 features just a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has an inferior number of cores, and they both have 4 GB of RAM memory, the Apple iPhone 11 also counts with a 64-bits processor. Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a little bit better screen than iPhone 11, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a way higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and a way greater display pixel density.
IPhone 11 features a greater camera than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same camera sensor size and a same resolution back camera, the iPhone 11 also counts with a way better video resolution. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a much better memory for games and applications than Apple iPhone 11, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the Galaxy XCover FieldPro also has a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a way better battery duration than iPhone 11, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 3110mAh.
IPhone 11 is not only the best phones of the ones we compare here, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.