Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 85.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x |
| 2020-04-04 | 2019-09-20 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.22 x 3.06 x 0.32 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 7.97 ounces |
| Black | Gold, Midnight green, Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2688 x 1242 pixels |
| -- | OLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 456 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Apple-designed 4 core GPU |
| 9.45 | 10.35 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3969mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 11 Pro Max has a score of 85.3, which is just a bit better than Galaxy XCover FieldPro's 80.1 global score. The iPhone 11 Pro Max comes with iOS 15.x OS, while Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with Android 8.0 Oreo OS. IPhone 11 Pro Max's design is lighter and incredibly thinner than the Galaxy XCover FieldPro, even when both of them were only released 7 months apart.
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max features a bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a little lower resolution of 1242 x 2688px and a quite inferior number of pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a larger display. The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro features much more memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than iPhone 11 Pro Max, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro also has an external memory card slot that holds up to 512 GB.
The iPhone 11 Pro Max features a little faster processor than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a lower number of cores and also slower, and they both have 4 GB of RAM, the iPhone 11 Pro Max also counts with a 64-bits CPU. Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a bit better battery performance than iPhone 11 Pro Max, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
The iPhone 11 Pro Max counts with a greater camera than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for low-light photos, and they both have a 0.39 inches sensor and a camera in the back with a 12 mega pixels resolution, the iPhone 11 Pro Max also counts with a much higher video quality.
The Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max is not only the best phones of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also the cheapest one, which makes it a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.