Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 88.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | iOS 15.x, 14.x |
| 2020-04-04 | 2020-10-23 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.29 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 5.78 ounces |
| Black | Black, Blue, Green, Purple, Red and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | $ 829.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2532 x 1170 pixels |
| -- | OLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Apple A14 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | 64-bit 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.45 | 10.62 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 2815mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 12 is much better than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, with an 88.7 score against 80.1. The iPhone 12 works with iOS 15.x operating system, and Galaxy XCover FieldPro works with Android 8.0 Oreo operating system. Although the iPhone 12 and Galaxy XCover FieldPro were released with only 7 months difference, the iPhone 12 is a lot thinner and a lot lighter.
Apple iPhone 12 has a bit sharper display than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1170 x 2532px and a bit less pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a larger display. IPhone 12 features a superior processor than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a lower number of cores (although they are faster), and they both have the same RAM memory amount, the iPhone 12 also counts with a 64 bits processor.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a way bigger memory for games and applications than Apple iPhone 12, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro also has a SD card slot that admits up to 512 GB. Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a much longer battery lifetime than Apple iPhone 12, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
The Apple iPhone 12 captures way better photographs and videos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for shooting photographs or videos in low-light situations, and they both have a same resolution camera in the back, the Apple iPhone 12 also counts with a way higher video resolution.
The Apple iPhone 12 is not only the best phones of the ones in this comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest one, making this phone an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.