Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | iOS 14.x |
| 2020-04-04 | 2020-11-13 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 5.18 x 2.53 x 0.29 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 4.76 ounces |
| Black | Black, Blue, Green, Purple, Red and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | $ 699.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 5.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | OLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 477 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Apple A14 Bionic chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | 64-bit 64-bit, 5 nm (Hexa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.45 | 10.62 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 2227mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 4.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 12 mini has an overall score of 88.5, which is better than the Galaxy XCover FieldPro's global score of 80.1. Apple iPhone 12 mini's design is incredibly thinner and extremely lighter than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, even when both were released with only a couple of months difference. The Apple iPhone 12 mini comes with iOS 14.x operating system, and Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo operating system.
The Apple iPhone 12 mini features a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a little lower 1080 x 2340 resolution and a little less pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a little larger display. IPhone 12 mini has a superior processing power than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a lower number of cores (although they are faster), and they both have 4 GB of RAM memory, the iPhone 12 mini also counts with a 64-bit processor.
IPhone 12 mini features a very superior camera than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for shooting images and video in poorly lited environments, and they both have a 12 mega pixels resolution back facing camera, the iPhone 12 mini also counts with a way better 3840x2160 video quality.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with much more memory to install applications and games than Apple iPhone 12 mini, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro also has a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 512 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a much longer battery performance than Apple iPhone 12 mini, because it has a 102 percent greater battery size.
In addition to being the best phone in our current comparison, Apple iPhone 12 mini is also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.