Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 92.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | iOS 15.x, 14.x |
| 2020-04-04 | 2020-10-23 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 5.78 x 2.82 x 0.29 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 6.66 ounces |
| Black | Gold, Graphite, Pacific blue and Silver |
| Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2532 x 1170 pixels |
| -- | OLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Apple A14 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | 64-bit 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.45 | 10.62 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 2815mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 12 Pro is much better than the Galaxy XCover FieldPro, with a 92.8 score against 80.1. Even though the iPhone 12 Pro and the Galaxy XCover FieldPro were only released 7 months apart, the iPhone 12 Pro is thinner and way lighter. IPhone 12 Pro works with iOS 15.x operating system, while Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with Android 8.0 Oreo operating system.
The Apple iPhone 12 Pro has a quite superior processing power than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a lower number of cores (although they are faster), it also counts with a 64-bits CPU and a higher amount of RAM memory. Apple iPhone 12 Pro has a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a quite worse number of pixels per inch of display and a little bit lower resolution of 1170 x 2532 pixels, it also counts with a bigger screen.
The iPhone 12 Pro has a way better camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for taking images or videos in low light situations, and they both have a back camera with a 12 mega pixels, the iPhone 12 Pro also counts with a lot higher (4K) video definition.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a quite bigger storage for games and applications than Apple iPhone 12 Pro, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a really longer battery lifetime than Apple iPhone 12 Pro, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 2815mAh.
In addition to being the best phone in this comparison, iPhone 12 Pro is also cheaper, making this phone an easy choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.