Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 93.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | iOS 15.x, 14.x |
| 2020-04-04 | 2020-11-13 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.33 x 3.07 x 0.29 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 8.03 ounces |
| Black | Gold, Graphite, Pacific blue and Silver |
| Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | $ 1100.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2778 x 1284 pixels |
| -- | OLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Apple A14 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | 64-bit 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.45 | 10.62 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3687mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max is much better than the Galaxy XCover FieldPro, with a score of 93.2 against 80.1. Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max's construction is somewhat lighter and notably thinner than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, although they were only released 7 months apart. The Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max comes with iOS 15.x OS, while Galaxy XCover FieldPro works with Android 8.0 Oreo OS.
The iPhone 12 Pro Max counts with a better CPU than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has an inferior number of cores , it also counts with 2 GB more RAM and a 64-bits processing unit. The iPhone 12 Pro Max features a little sharper display than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a little lower pixels quantity in each display inch and a little worse 1284 x 2778 resolution, it also counts with a really bigger screen.
IPhone 12 Pro Max captures greater photos and videos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for capturing photos and video in low-light environments, and they both have a 12 MP back-facing camera, the iPhone 12 Pro Max also counts with a much higher (4K) video definition.
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a greater storage for apps and games than Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB. Galaxy XCover FieldPro has longer battery duration than iPhone 12 Pro Max, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max is not only the best phones in our comparison, but it's also cheaper than the other phone.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.