Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 91.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | iOS 15.x |
| 2020-04-04 | 2021-09-24 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.30 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Black | Blue, Midnight, Pink, Red and Starlight |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | $ 799.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2532 x 1170 pixels |
| -- | OLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.45 | 10.62 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3227mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 13 is much better than the Galaxy XCover FieldPro, getting a global score of 91.5 against 80.1. Apple iPhone 13 is a newer cellphone, and it's also noticeably thinner and extremely lighter than the Galaxy XCover FieldPro. The Apple iPhone 13 counts with iOS 15.x operating system, while Galaxy XCover FieldPro works with Android 8.0 Oreo operating system.
IPhone 13 counts with a better CPU than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has an inferior number of cores (although they are faster), and they both have the same RAM amount, the iPhone 13 also counts with a 64-bits CPU. The iPhone 13 counts with just a bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a quite lower 1170 x 2532 resolution and a quite inferior amount of pixels per display inch, it also counts with a larger screen.
IPhone 13 has a greater camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for shooting photographs and/or video in poorly lited situations, and they both have a 12 megapixels resolution camera, the iPhone 13 also counts with a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a quite bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than iPhone 13, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a really longer battery duration than Apple iPhone 13, because it has a 39% larger battery capacity.
Even being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, iPhone 13 is also very cheap compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.