Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 93.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | iOS 15.x |
| 2020-04-04 | 2021-09-24 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.30 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 7.20 ounces |
| Black | Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver |
| Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2532 x 1170 pixels |
| -- | OLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.45 | 10.71 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3095mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 13 Pro has a global score of 93.3, which is better than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro's score of 80.1. IPhone 13 Pro comes with iOS 15.x OS, and Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro comes with Android 8.0 Oreo OS. The iPhone 13 Pro construction is newer, much lighter and notably thinner than the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro.
IPhone 13 Pro features a faster processor than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has 2 lesser CPU cores , it also counts with a 64-bit CPU and more RAM. IPhone 13 Pro counts with a little bit better display than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a little bit lower pixels density and a bit worse resolution of 1170 x 2532 pixels, it also counts with a bigger screen.
IPhone 13 Pro captures greater photos and videos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have a 12 mega-pixels resolution back facing camera and a F1.5 camera aperture, the iPhone 13 Pro also has a much higher 3840x2160 video resolution. Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Apple iPhone 13 Pro, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that supports up to 512 GB.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a much longer battery life than iPhone 13 Pro, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we compare here, Apple iPhone 13 Pro is also the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.