Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 92.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | iOS 16.x |
| 2020-04-04 | 2022-09-16 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.31 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Black | (Product) RED, Blue, Midnight and Purple Starlight |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | $ 799.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2532 x 1170 pixels |
| -- | OLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Apple 15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Apple GPU 5-core GPU |
| 9.45 | 10.71 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | -- |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3279mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 14 is better than the Galaxy XCover FieldPro, getting a general score of 92.5 against 80.1. The iPhone 14 construction is a lot newer, extremely lighter and noticeably thinner than the Galaxy XCover FieldPro. The iPhone 14 counts with iOS 16.x operating system, while Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo operating system.
The iPhone 14 has a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a little lower 1170 x 2532 resolution and a little bit lower screen pixels density, it also counts with a bigger display. The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Apple iPhone 14, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
Apple iPhone 14 has a better CPU than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a lower number of cores , it also counts with a 64 bits processor and more RAM memory. Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with improved battery performance than iPhone 14, because it has a 37 percent more battery size.
The iPhone 14 captures much clearer videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have a same resolution back camera and a same size aperture, the iPhone 14 also has a much higher 3840x2160 video definition.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, the iPhone 14 is also very cheap compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.