Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 95.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | iOS 16.x |
| 2020-04-04 | 2022-09-16 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 5.81 x 2.81 x 0.31 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 7.27 ounces |
| Black | Deep Purple, Gold, Silver and Space Black |
| Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2556 x 1179 pixels |
| -- | OLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 461 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Apple A16 Bionic (4 nm) chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3460 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Apple GPU 5-core GPU |
| 9.45 | 10.8 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 11.33 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | -- |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3200mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone 14 Pro is much better than the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, getting a 95.6 score against 80.1. Apple iPhone 14 Pro's design is incredibly newer, way thinner and lighter than the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro. The Apple iPhone 14 Pro counts with iOS 16.x operating system, and Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro works with Android 8.0 Oreo operating system.
The iPhone 14 Pro features a better processing power than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has an inferior number of cores (although they are faster), it also counts with 2 GB more RAM and a 64-bit CPU. Apple iPhone 14 Pro has a better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a just a bit lower pixel density and a quite lower resolution of 1179 x 2556px, it also counts with a larger display.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a greater memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than iPhone 14 Pro, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that allows up to 512 GB. The iPhone 14 Pro has a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not recommended for shooting photographs or video in low light environments, it also counts with a way better video definition and a lot higher 48 mega pixels resolution back camera.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a superior battery duration than iPhone 14 Pro, because it has a 41% more battery size.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, iPhone 14 Pro is also a bit cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.