Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 94.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | iOS 16.x |
| 2020-04-04 | 2022-09-16 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.33 x 3.05 x 0.31 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 8.47 ounces |
| Black | Deep Purple, Gold, Silver and Space Black |
| Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2796 x 1290 pixels |
| -- | OLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 460 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Apple 16 Bionic (4 nm) chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3460 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Apple GPU 5-core GPU |
| 9.45 | 10.8 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 11.33 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | -- |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4323mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 14 Pro Max is better than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, getting a global score of 94.9 against 80.1. IPhone 14 Pro Max's body is notably newer, a little bit lighter and much thinner than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro. The iPhone 14 Pro Max has iOS 16.x OS, and Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro comes with Android 8.0 Oreo OS.
IPhone 14 Pro Max counts with a more powerful processing unit than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has 2 lesser cpu cores , it also counts with a 64-bit CPU and a greater amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a little more vivid screen than iPhone 14 Pro Max, because although it has a way smaller screen, it also counts with a better pixel density and a slightly better resolution of 1440 x 2560px.
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a greater memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than iPhone 14 Pro Max, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 512 GB. IPhone 14 Pro Max has a greater camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not good for low-light images, it also counts with a lot higher resolution camera and a lot better 3840x2160 video definition.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a bit better battery lifetime than Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max, because it has a 4% more battery size.
The iPhone 14 Pro Max not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing, but it's also the cheapest, making it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.