Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 83 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | iOS 9.x |
| 2020-04-04 | 2015-09-09 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 5.44 x 2.64 x 0.28 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black | Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Plastic | Aluminium, Glass and Steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | $ 575.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 750 x 1334 pixels |
| -- | IPS LCD |
| 576 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Apple A9 APL0898 chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | 64-bit Twister, 64-bit (Dual-Core 1840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 2 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | PowerVR GT7600 (650 MHz) GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 29.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.9 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 1715mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 240 hours standby time 14 hours talk time |
| 6.32 | 3.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 6s has a global score of 83, which is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro's global score of 80.1. IPhone 6s is an older phone than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, but it's incredibly lighter and incredibly thinner anyway. The iPhone 6s has iOS 9.x operating system, while Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro comes with Android 8.0 Oreo operating system.
The Apple iPhone 6s and Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro have really similar screens, although the Apple iPhone 6s has a little bit smaller display, a way worse resolution of 1334 x 750 pixels and a much lower pixel count per screen inch. Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than iPhone 6s, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 512 GB.
The iPhone 6s counts with a little faster CPU than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has 2 GB lesser RAM and an inferior number of cores and slower, it also counts with a 64 bits processing unit and a GPU. IPhone 6s has a superior camera than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a way smaller aperture and a tinier sensor which gives a worse photo and video quality, and they both have a camera in the back with a 12 MP resolution, the iPhone 6s also counts with a way higher (4K) video resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a much longer battery performance than Apple iPhone 6s, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Even being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, the Apple iPhone 6s is also by far the cheapest, making it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.