Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | iOS 9.x |
| 2020-04-04 | 2015-09-09 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.23 x 3.07 x 0.29 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black | Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Plastic | Aluminium, Glass and Steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | $ 625.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| -- | IPS LCD |
| 576 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.9 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Apple A9 APL1022 chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | 64-bit Twister, 64-bit (Dual-Core 1840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 2 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | PowerVR GT7600 (650 MHz) GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 29.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.9 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 2750mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 384 hours standby time 24 hours talk time |
| 6.32 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 6s Plus is slightly better than the Galaxy XCover FieldPro, getting a global score of 84.2 against 80.1. Even though the iPhone 6s Plus is much older than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, it's construction is a lot thinner and incredibly lighter. IPhone 6s Plus works with iOS 9.x operating system, while Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with Android 8.0 Oreo operating system.
The iPhone 6s Plus has a bit more vivid display than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a much lower pixels amount per display inch and a way worse 1920 x 1080 resolution, it also counts with a little bit bigger display. The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with more memory to install applications and games than Apple iPhone 6s Plus, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB.
IPhone 6s Plus has a little faster processing unit than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has lesser RAM memory and lesser and slower cpu cores, it also counts with an additional GPU and a 64 bits CPU. The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a superior battery performance than Apple iPhone 6s Plus, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 2750mAh.
The iPhone 6s Plus features a much better camera than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier sensor shooting lower quality images and a lot smaller camera aperture, and they both have a same resolution back-facing camera, the iPhone 6s Plus also counts with a lot higher (4K) video quality.
IPhone 6s Plus is not only the best phones in this comparison, but it's also a lot cheaper, making buying this phone an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.