Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2020-04-04 | 2016-09-16 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 5.44 x 2.64 x 0.28 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 4.87 ounces |
| Black | Black, Gold, Jet black, Red, Rose gold and Silver |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | $ 849.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1334 x 750 pixels |
| -- | IPS LCD |
| 576 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Apple A10 Fusion APL1W24 (16 nm) chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | 64-bit (Quad-Core 2340 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | PowerVR 7XT GT7600 Plus GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 1960mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 3.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 7 has a score of 81.6, which is a bit better than Galaxy XCover FieldPro's 80.1 global score. The Apple iPhone 7 is an incredibly older phone than the Galaxy XCover FieldPro, but it is notably lighter and a lot thinner anyway. The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a bit more powerful CPU than iPhone 7, because it has 2 GB more RAM memory and 4 more CPU cores.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a bit sharper screen than iPhone 7, because it has a lot greater screen pixels density, a quite bigger screen and a much higher 1440 x 2560px resolution. IPhone 7 has more memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with more internal storage.
IPhone 7 has a much better camera than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not good for low light photos and a smaller back-facing camera sensor capturing lower quality images, and they both have a same resolution back camera, the iPhone 7 also counts with a lot higher video quality.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a much better battery life than Apple iPhone 7, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
The iPhone 7 not only is the best devices of the ones we compare here, but it's also a bargain compared to the other devices, which makes it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.