Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2020-04-04 | 2017-09-22 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.24 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Black | Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | $ 949.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| -- | IPS LCD |
| 576 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.45 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 2691mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 8 Plus is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, having an 87.1 score against 80.1. Apple iPhone 8 Plus is an notably older device than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, but Apple was able to make it noticeably lighter and extremely thinner. Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a little more vivid screen than iPhone 8 Plus, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher pixel density and a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution.
Apple iPhone 8 Plus features just a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has 1 GB less RAM memory and 2 lesser and slower cores, it also counts with a 64-bits processor. The Apple iPhone 8 Plus features more storage capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with more internal memory.
IPhone 8 Plus shoots way better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for capturing images and video in low-light situations and a tinier sensor shooting worse quality videos and pictures, and they both have a 12 mega pixels resolution camera in the back, the iPhone 8 Plus also counts with a way better 3840x2160 video resolution.
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a very superior battery performance than iPhone 8 Plus, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
IPhone 8 Plus is not only the best devices of the ones we are comparing, but it's also cheaper than the other phone.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.