Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 81.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x |
| 2020-04-04 | 2020-04-24 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Black | Black, Red and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | $ 399.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1334 x 750 pixels |
| -- | IPS LCD |
| 576 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Apple-designed 4 core GPU |
| 9.45 | 10.35 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 1821mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 3.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone SE (2020) is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, getting an 81.5 score against 80.1. The iPhone SE (2020) body is notably thinner and a lot lighter than the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, even though both of them were only released 1 months apart. IPhone SE (2020) comes with iOS 15.x operating system, while Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro works with Android 8.0 Oreo operating system.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a bit better display than iPhone SE (2020), because it has a much better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels, a quite bigger display and a lot better amount of pixels per display inch. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a much bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Apple iPhone SE (2020), and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Galaxy XCover FieldPro also has a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
IPhone SE (2020) counts with just a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM and an inferior number of cores and slower, it also counts with a 64-bit processor. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a very superior battery life than Apple iPhone SE (2020), because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 1821mAh.
IPhone SE (2020) has a greater camera than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller camera sensor shooting worse quality photos and videos and a smaller diafragm aperture which is not nice for capturing images in low-light environments, and they both have a same resolution back camera, the iPhone SE (2020) also counts with a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition.
Apple iPhone SE (2020) is not only the best phones in our comparison, but it's also a lot cheaper, making this phone an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.