Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2020-04-04 | 2018-10-26 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Black | Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| -- | IPS LCD |
| 576 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.45 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone XR has a score of 82, which is a bit better than Galaxy XCover FieldPro's score of 80.1. Although the iPhone XR is older than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, it's construction is lighter and notably thinner. The iPhone XR features a little faster processor than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has an inferior number of slower cores and 1 GB less RAM memory, it also counts with a 64 bits CPU.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a little bit better screen than Apple iPhone XR, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a lot higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a lot greater pixel density. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a much better storage capacity to store more apps and games than iPhone XR, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Galaxy XCover FieldPro also has an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a much longer battery lifetime than Apple iPhone XR, because it has a 53 percent larger battery size. Apple iPhone XR features a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is worse for low light photos, and they both have a same size camera sensor and the same resolution back-facing camera, the Apple iPhone XR also counts with a lot higher 3840x2160 video definition.
IPhone XR not only is the best devices of the ones we compare here, but it's also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.