Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2020-04-04 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| Black | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| -- | OLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.45 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone XS has a score of 84.2, which is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro's general score of 80.1. Although the iPhone XS is older than the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, it's design is much lighter and notably thinner. IPhone XS features a little better processing power than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a lower number of cores, and they both have a 4 GB RAM memory, the iPhone XS also counts with a 64-bit CPU.
The iPhone XS and Galaxy XCover FieldPro both count with incredibly similar displays, because although the iPhone XS has a quite lower 1125 x 2436 pixels resolution and a just a little worse pixel amount in each inch of display, it also counts with a bit bigger screen. Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a very superior storage capacity to install games and applications than Apple iPhone XS, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro also has a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 512 GB.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a very superior battery life than iPhone XS, because it has a 4500mAh battery size. The iPhone XS has a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have a same resolution back facing camera and the same sensor size, the iPhone XS also counts with a lot higher (4K) video resolution.
The Apple iPhone XS is not only the best devices of the ones we compare here, but it's also the cheapest, making this phone an easy choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.