Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 77.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Asus |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2020-04-04 | 2018-10-29 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.25 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Black | Black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| -- | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 3.63 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a little bit better than Asus ROG Phone, with an 80.1 score against 77.1. Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro's body is newer than the Asus ROG Phone's, although it's much thicker and a lot heavier. The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a slightly better screen than Asus ROG Phone, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better quantity of pixels per inch in the display and a better 1440 x 2560px resolution.
Asus ROG Phone counts with a much greater memory to install applications and games than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage. Asus ROG Phone has just a little better hardware performance than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Asus ROG Phone also has more RAM.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a bit better battery duration than Asus ROG Phone, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh. Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a very superior camera than Asus ROG Phone, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 video resolution, the same video frame rate and a 0.39 inches back camera sensor, the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro also has a bigger aperture to take better low light captures and video.
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro costs a bit more than Asus ROG Phone, but it's still a great deal, because you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.